Nonprofits and Journalism: An Update (Full Series)
State of the media | Liberal cancellation movements
The 1619 project | Responses from the center and the right

Responses from the center and the right

Developments in corporate media, the left-wing union-dominated newsroom culture, and the openly ideological left-wing advocacy press drew responses from independent journalists and organizations outside of the progressive ‘consensus’ of Canada. left of the current year.

Self-publishing: the dissidents of the sub-stack. The other notable development has taken place outside the associative sphere and has provoked severe condemnation from the self-proclaimed guardians of the journalistic profession: the rise of the online newsletter, mainly on the Substack platform. Substack allows writers to sell their writing in the form of electronic newsletters directly to individual subscribers.

Two of the most prominent journalists to leave mainstream media for self-published Substack are both dissidents from the political left: neoliberal Zionist Bari Weiss, who left the New York Times amid NewsGuild-backed efforts to purge the editors responsible for Tom Cotton’s editorial, and longtime socialist and Western (and Israel) foreign policy critic Glenn Greenwald, who left the Intercept, l online leftist news supported by Pierre Omidyar point of sale that Greenwald co-founded.

Both had, from different perspectives, become critics of the fundamental priorities of the progressive left during the Trump years. Weiss, in addition to her increasingly lonely support for center-left Israel, has become an “awakened” aggressive social policy critic, an opposition she has exposed from her new independent post.

Greenwald, a longtime critic of US national security policy who is perhaps best known for helping Edward Snowden disclose classified information about the activities of the National Security Agency, has been shown to be a staunch critic of behavior. national security bureaucracies during investigations into alleged ties between Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government. Greenwald also criticized decisions by big tech companies to ban former President Trump from their platforms, earning him “strange new respect” from those on the political right.

The rise of Substack as a hotbed of ideological dissidents like Weiss, Greenwald, and even some conservatives provoked a reaction from the gatekeepers of institutional journalism. The continued creation of the Clubhouse social media platform, which facilitates online discussion forums, has drawn criticism from left-wing gatekeepers of journalism who have complained that not keeping conversations on the site would lead to “unfettered conversations” and lacked a “path to accountability”. – one supposes, a “way” to cancel those whose conversations have become too “free” by opposing the progressive sacred cows of the current year.

New reporting policy. The self-publication has also become an issue-level policy report. Steven Gutowski, firearms journalist at the time Washington Free Beacon which we have mentioned as one of the “most numerous [issue] beat reporters, ”created his own for-profit website, The Reload, to cover gun policy. Since the site launched in late April 2021, the Reload has covered the National Rifle Association bankruptcy lawsuit and leadership controversies, the Supreme Court’s decision to hear a challenge to New York’s strict regulations. concealed transport and the Biden administration’s draft proposal to regulate as well. called “ghost weapons”.

For their part, center-right interests have expanded their state-level reporting networks, at least somewhat in response to the rise of the Liberal States Newsroom and the Mail-Aligned Newsroom. the Democrats. The Franklin News Foundation, aligned with the network of public policy groups surrounding the Illinois Policy Institute, took over what was the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity and the folded website. He created Center Square, a state policy reporting network to replace Watchdog.

The financial momentum we noted in our last survey, in which the left had a strong advantage, remains even in the narrow world of new state efforts. In its 2019 tax year, the only year for which information is available at the time of publication, the Liberal States Newsroom reported $ 6,982,113 in revenue, more than triple the $ 1,713,981. of the Franklin News Foundation relative to its most recent public tax year of 2018.


The Trump years brought dramatic changes to the media, as a motivated, liberal audience flocked alongside millions of dollars in nonprofit and for-profit money. Along with this influx of audiences, there has been the rise of the “internal crowd”, imposing a strict ideological line among journalists in metropolitan newspapers with the support of unions, which ostensibly exist to protect journalists from arbitrary dismissals, among other work practices. The rise of the internal and external “cancellation culture” has led some writers to platforms over which they have maintained more personal control, while the center-right media have tried to distinguish between accurately reporting on. the state of politics and anger a now former president of the United States and his supporters.

In the nonprofit world, the ‘Trump bump’ for investigative (liberal) media retreated even before their nemesis left office, but it was replaced by a new ideological effort to advance theories. radical racialism under the guise of history with the backing of one of America’s biggest funders. Ideologically aligned state house reporting resumed, with a continuing advantage for the left in terms of resources.

As the Biden administration progresses, it remains to be seen what happens to the media, for-profit and not-for-profit. Will the realities of the opposition generate more investment from center-right donors to hold the administration to account? Will the continued ideological purges orchestrated by the unions in the big newsrooms weaken them further? Progressive activists and donors, who have spent the Trump administration to invest resources in liberal media, will they continue to do so, now that their nemesis has left the central political scene? Only time will tell.

Source link