For the publisher:

Re “Shunning Shot, but Aligning Up for Antibodies” (cover page, September 19):

I would like to say these are my treatments and I want them to come back. I am a 24 year old medical student who has suffered from crippling Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis since the age of 15. After several years of struggling, I finally started a monoclonal antibody infusion regimen that allowed me to live a completely pain-free life. , normal life over the past five years.

However, almost two months ago, I was informed by my infusion center that all of my medicine supplies had to go to Covid patients in the hospital (the vast majority of whom are not vaccinated), I have therefore had to return to live in chronic pain with the less effective drugs.

As a medical student, I am taught that in times of crisis, the resources must go to the sickest patients, but despite everything, the thought continues to cross my head: they chose not to be. vaccinate; I had no choice but to not have arthritis, but now we both have to suffer.

Ellie Cook
Yakima, Laver.

For the publisher:

This story reveals that many people who have not been vaccinated against Covid-19 line up to receive monoclonal antibodies after contracting the virus and showing symptoms. The federal government covers the cost of treatment and is responsible for distributing the drug to the states. Antibody treatment is 100 times more expensive than the vaccine.

Seven southern states account for 70% of orders for this drug whose supply is declining. The vaccine not only protects the individual who receives it, but also protects other members of the community, while the antibody treatment only protects the individual who receives it.

The Biden administration should stop caring about those who act irresponsibly and put all Americans at risk. The federal government should not provide monoclonal antibodies to states unless they show that they are encouraging people to get vaccinated. In addition, antibody therapy should only be available to those who have received the vaccine, but who nevertheless became ill due to other people’s refusal to be vaccinated.

Steven flaumenhaft
West Sayville, New York

For the publisher:

Monoclonal antibodies are a very expensive treatment for Covid that I think people who consciously choose not to get vaccinated do not deserve. The cost of treatment is borne by the federal government, but in the end, U.S. taxpayers get their hands on our wallets to support people who are too stubborn and / or crazy to reach out for the Covid vaccine.

Do I, as a senior on a fixed income, have to pay for these people while I’m fully immunized, wear my mask every time I step out of my apartment, and practice social distancing?

As a nurse practitioner, I am dismayed and angry at the backward thinking and nerve of the unvaccinated who now want me and millions of others to pay for their medical treatment.

Gail Dolson
Corte Madera, California

For the publisher:

Patients who receive monoclonal antibodies cannot receive the vaccine for 90 days. This is because residual monoclonal antibodies can attenuate the immune response to the vaccine. This long waiting period will probably make it even less likely that these patients, who are already hesitant to be vaccinated, will ever be vaccinated.

Conversation of opinion
Questions around the Covid-19 vaccine and its deployment.

Harvey gorrin
Mount Kisco, New York
The author is an allergist-immunologist.

For the publisher:

Re “For Democrats, Difficult Health Care Options” (front page, September 21):

Drug and Medicare companies fabricated congressional “shock” over whether to improve Medicare or expand Medicaid.

Pharmaceutical lobbying will apparently exclude price controls from the budget bill, eliminating Medicare savings the bill would have deployed to simultaneously help the elderly (by adding vision, hearing and dental coverage to Medicare) and the poor. (by implementing the expansion of Medicaid nationwide).

Meanwhile, according to the Congressional Medicare Payments Advisory Board, Medicare Advantage plans from private insurers continue to drain the treasury, inflating taxpayer costs by more than $ 500 per year for every registrant.

Our country could afford universal coverage if we limit price hikes by pharmaceutical companies and reduce the $ 600 billion in unnecessary administrative costs inflicted by private insurers.

The real conflict in health policy in America is that between corporate profits and the needs of patients.

David U. Himmelstein
Steffie Wool manipulator
Chatham East, NY
The authors, both physicians, are prominent professors at Hunter College and lecturers at Harvard Medical School.

For the publisher:

I join with the “6 Women Who Reached Adulthood Before Roe” (letter, September 21). I too had an illegal abortion before Roe v. Wade.

I asked my parents to help me free myself from an abusive man. My dad went on the phone and called a friend. A few days later, the three of us went to an abandoned theater in Detroit. My mother was waiting in the car.

My dad and I walked around a side door and entered a dark hallway, walked up the stairs, knocked on a door, and were ushered into a tiny walled-out office by a terribly skinny old man. He insisted we were in the wrong place. My dad insisted we weren’t.

He led papa behind a partition. I heard him ask, “Who gave you my name?” – and daddy’s answer: “I won’t tell you any more than I will ever tell anyone your name.” Then “$ 400”, and I was waved inside. Dad waited outside the bulkhead where I had been.

A few days later, my parents rushed me to the hospital. I was told I almost died. I have never regretted it.

I was free. No woman should go through what I did to be free.

Carol Jacobsen
Ann Arbor, Michigan.
The writer is a professor of art, women and gender studies, and law at the University of Michigan and founding director of the Michigan Women’s Justice and Clemency Project.

For the publisher:

Re “Bison, Not Hunters, Belong in National Parks”, by Matthew Scully (Opinion guest dissertation, September 18):

Most people love national parks because their rugged beauty is a balm for our senses. The sight of elk, deer, buffalo and maybe even a glimpse of bears or wolves strengthens our admiration and appreciation of the natural world. In addition, these populations of wild animals are a legacy to be left to future generations.

Unfortunately, others see a magnificent animal and want to shoot it in the head with an overpowered rifle, drag its bloody carcass to their truck and revel in their conquest.

There is hunting all over the world. Wild animals are slaughtered for sport, for horns, for tusks, for esoteric “drugs”. There should certainly be a refuge in our national parks, where nature should be able to take its course.

I do not understand the pleasure it takes to kill a wild animal, and I will never understand it; it can hardly be called a sport. But if this bloodlust is allowed in many parts of the country, there should also be limits – and national parks should be places of peace and beauty for man and beast alike.

Carole kraines
Deerfield, Illinois.

For the publisher:

Because the Republican Party continues to whitewash the deadly January 6 insurgency on Capitol Hill, there will undoubtedly be more violent attacks on our government institutions, and they will make January 6 look tame.

The GOP takes no responsibility for its role in the current attack on our democracy. No matter how secure our elections are, if the Republican candidate doesn’t win, the peaceful transition of power is just wishful thinking.

Martin geller
Manhasset, New York


Source link