The HC was informed that the Home Office would take immediate steps to submit it to the state legislature after Cabinet approval.

The Karnataka government informed the Karnataka High Court on Thursday that a bill had been prepared on the issue of online betting and gambling, media said. And the same was sent to the State Cabinet for approval after proper consultation with various departments and legal experts, the court informed. It happened as the HC heard a petition calling for a ban on all forms of online betting and gambling.

According to a Live Law report, the affidavit of Chief Secretary P Ravi Kumar said: “In accordance with Article No.1 of Karnataka Government’s First Schedule (Transaction of Trade Rules) 1977, the bill requires the approval of both chambers of the Legislative Assembly and, therefore, prior Cabinet approval is required. “

The HC was informed that the Home Office would take immediate steps to submit it to the state legislature after Cabinet approval. “Shortly after receiving the approval of this proposal by the State Cabinet, the Home Office will take the necessary and immediate steps to present the bill to the state legislature with a request for submit the bill to both houses of the legislature, ”the affidavit added. .

The division bench led by Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka postponed the case until July 25, when the government is expected to make a statement regarding the Cabinet decision, according to a report by Herald of the Deccan.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by DR Sharada, a resident of Davanagere, seeking an order from the HC banning all forms of online gambling and betting of any kind, until a appropriate regulatory framework is established and the necessary regulations come into force.

In February 2021, Karnataka’s Interior Minister Basavaraja Bommai informed media that the government was considering passing a law to monitor online gambling in the state. He added that the planned wording of the bill was underway and the various provisions classifying the subject in other states were under consideration.



Source link